My favorite philosopher Michael Huemer has an interesting article entitled “Existence if Evidence of Immortality” arguing for reincarnation which I discussed previously on this blog in a post entitled “The Bayesian Case for Reincarnation.” The argument, as summarized in a blog post from Huemer, is:
1. There are many well-known problems with reasoning with infinities (Pascal's Mugging, etc.). I'm profoundy reluctant to conculde anything with certainty based on calculations involving infinities.
2. Conventionally the universe is 13.8 billion years old, which is a long way from infinitely old. And it may well have a finite end. Of course there may be "other universes", or even an infinity of them, in some sense. But maybe not.
I don't think you've got "evidence" here of anything, let alone probability 1.0. At the most we can say "we can't prove it's impossible".
1. There are many well-known problems with reasoning with infinities (Pascal's Mugging, etc.). I'm profoundy reluctant to conculde anything with certainty based on calculations involving infinities.
2. Conventionally the universe is 13.8 billion years old, which is a long way from infinitely old. And it may well have a finite end. Of course there may be "other universes", or even an infinity of them, in some sense. But maybe not.
I don't think you've got "evidence" here of anything, let alone probability 1.0. At the most we can say "we can't prove it's impossible".